Almost done.
In the previous post, I offered my impression of the spiritual condition of the Laodicean church. Today I’m going to attempt to summarize the historical significance.
Rev 3:14-22
And to the angel of the church of the Laodicea write: The Amen, the faithful and true Witness, the Head of the creation of God, says these things:
I know your works, that you are neither cold nor hot. I would that you were cold or hot.
So because you are lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will vomit you out of My mouth.
Because you say, I am rich and increased with goods and have need of nothing, and do not know that you are wretched and miserable and poor and blind and naked,
I counsel you to buy from Me gold purified by fire, so that you may be rich; and white clothing, so that you may be clothed, and so that the shame of your nakedness does not appear. And anoint your eyes with eye salve, so that you may see.
As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten; therefore be zealous and repent.
Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears My voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and will dine with him and he with Me.
To him who overcomes I will grant to sit with Me in My throne, even as I also overcame and have sat down with My Father in His throne.
He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.
The “root” of this church’s grand appearance probably reaches back to the post-reformation spiritual chilliness of much of visible protestant Christianity. The apathy which marks Laodicea is the logical next step beyond the development of repressed, mechanical and business-like religion. With a form of hierarchy still firmly in place, it would tend to leave the average Christian just on the outside of truly meeting with God on a personalized level. People would eventually drift farther away in their hearts while perhaps still retaining the name “Christian” and some semblance of moral thinking.
In effect, there are probably a few truly interested individuals within this group while the rest are happy to warm a pew every week or two. For many, the spheres of “real life” and “religious life” rarely overlap and Jesus has become a marginalized, Children’s Bible character to whom we might remember to turn when all other options have failed.
What happened?
I think the arrival of the Modern Age, and the emphasis on learning, scientific discovery and human empowerment may hold a clue.
Before the 1700’s, a few useful inventions changed the lives of many an average person.
In 1439, Johann Gutenberg created the first movable-type printing press, which eventually would pave the way for the Bible (as well as other writings) to be made readily available to the masses.
1590 saw the invention of the microscope by Zacharias Janssen and 1610 marks the birth of the telescope by Hans Lippershey. Both of these developments have been steadily improved upon and instrumental in man’s increased knowledge about the physical universe in which we live.
From the early 1700’s right up to the present, hundreds of new discoveries and inventions have been made. From improved methods of weaving cloth to more efficient ways to grow and harvest crops to better building products to highly technical means of communication…huge advancements have been made in a relatively short period of time. Industry, agriculture, science, history, music and art have experienced major changes. Even the way nations wage war has been dramatically impacted in the last few hundred years. Many of these changes directly touch our everyday lives in ways we rarely notice.
But, along with these amazing developments (many made by Christians who desired to honor God with their efforts) arose an unmistakable attitude of arrogance concerning the achievements and potential greatness of humankind.
Certain decidedly unbiblical ways of thinking surfaced and started to spread. Charles Lyell (1797-1875) is remembered as “The father of modern geology”. However, he promoted an idea that the present is the key to the past, aka the principle of uniformity. This mindset would seriously impact the way scientists regarded future advancements–including dating methods for rocks and fossils, the development of various landforms and speculation concerning the age of the earth. God’s divine presence has systematically been marginalized in the scientific realm. In light of this, I find it fascinating that Peter wrote:
For this is hidden from them by their willing it, that the heavens were of old, and the earth out of the water, and through water, being held together by the Word of God,
through which the world that then was, being flooded by water, perished. 2 Peter 3:5-6
Written: 1st century AD. How did HE know that eventually many would categorically deny the Biblical account of a catastrophic, global flood that drastically re-shaped the entire face of the planet?
Following Lyell, Charles Darwin catapulted the pre-existing (but not yet widely accepted) theory of evolution onto center stage in 1859, with the publishing of The Origin of Species. His work was readily accepted by many who found distasteful the Biblical teaching that we have been created by, and are accountable to the Great I AM of Judeo-Christian Scripture.
Of course, this rejection of God’s Word is nothing “new”. From the beginning, man has been saying of the eternally existent, triune God “ Let us break their bands in two and cast away their cords from us. “(Psalm 2:3). Natural man is a rebel, always looking for an excuse to play god for himself rather than humbly reconcile with his Maker.
With secular humanism on the rise, the object of many a man’s worship has been almighty man. Various God-minimizing branches of science (ie sociology, anthropology, psychology) have sprung into being and the teachings of men like Sigmund Freud (psychoanalysis) , Herbert Spencer (biological evolution causes social change), Carl Marx (communism), Ernst Haeckel (materialism) and Fredrich Nietzche (God is dead) pushed for a completely man-centered society.
Following World War II, the citizens of many Westernized countries have experienced unprecedented access to freedom from oppression and ease of lifestyle. Most of us have no clue what true physical “neediness” really looks like. And still, we grab for more while preaching a “gospel” message of health and material prosperity.
The main reason I’ve swung from examining church history into the secular realm is because the two have become quite interwoven and, on many levels, today’s Westernized Protestant church has been heavily influenced by humanistic thought in the forms of relativism, socialism, hedonism, politicalism and feminism. We honor Jesus with our lips but our hearts are far, far away.
I’m not suggesting that it is wrong to have material possessions. What to do with what we’ve acquired is between each individual and God. But there is much truth to Jesus’ words when He said that it is easier for a camel to fit through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. “Richness” is relative. And, it can take the form of high intelligence or even successful “self-sufficiency” as well as that of worldly goods.
I think the point is that we don’t even recognize our spiritual poverty when we are consumed with chasing after things that, ultimately, mean nothing.
*****************************************************
In Israelite history, there is a similar time period. After the Jews returned to their homeland, restored the temple and wall, Greece (known for it’s elevation of human intellect through philosophy and cycle of democracy-oligarchy-tyranny) and then Rome (decidedly pagan, with it’s emperor worship and moral decadence) moved in as conquering nations.
Even though the Jewish state was allowed to continue in semi-autonomy, I would expect certain societal attitudes and cultural influences may have taken their toll.
In fact, during the Greek occupation, many Jews became secularized and there was strife between this group and that of the orthodox Jews. around 170 AD, Antiochus Epiphanes moved in and made a show of friendliness to Jews who had adopted Hellenistic culture. He later betrayed them and defiled the Jewish Temple by performing a pagan sacrificing on the alter. Subsequently, civil and religious Jewish liberties were suspended, the daily sacrifice was prohibited and an altar to Jupiter (The Roman god of sky, lightening and thunder) was set up. Many were the offenses against the God of heaven and His people, who were forced to eat the flesh of swine in contradiction of the Law.
Has not something similar occurred within Christ’s Temple (meaning His body, the Church) as so many of us have made friends with worldly thinking and aspirations? Have we, in our comatose state, allowed a hostile takeover without a struggle? Is it possible that many Christians today are spiritually “eating” humanistic swine’s flesh instead of dining on the pure Bread of Life?
If there is an actual parallel there, Jesus’ instruction to believers is to run for the hills when the abomination the causes desolation makes an appearance. (Matthew 24:15-16) I don’t know for sure how that applies to modern Christianity, whether we are supposed to physically run or spiritually flee from the dangers. But it’s something that’s been on my mind lately. And I’ve been praying that the Lord directs my husband in the instance that we need to make any major changes.
Shortly after the atrocities committed by Antiochus Epiphanes (approximately 3 years later) it is recorded that a Jewish revolt occurred under Judas Maccabeus took place. In 165, the Jewish Temple was cleansed and rededicated and in 141, the deliverance of Judea was complete.
The religious sects of Pharisees and Sadducees are first mentioned around 109 BC. By the time of Jesus, the two groups had very distinct characteristics. The Pharisees were dedicated to preserving the Law and were nonconformist in their attitude. They had become prideful and judgmental and their loyalty to the maintenance of religion actually got in the way of their being able to see Jesus as their Messiah. Similar Christian groups today might be recognized as “hyper-fundamentalists”.
The Sadducees were a secularized group which denied the authority of tradition, limited the trustworthiness of Scripture to only that which included the Mosaic Law and earlier writings, denied the doctrine of resurrection and categorically rejected the existence of angels or spirits. Hm. Kind of resembles the beliefs of some who identify with “liberal Christianity”.
In addition, there were the Essenes, who were somewhat removed from society, devoted time to reading and study of scripture, prayer and ceremonial washings, they lived in community and held pacifistic beliefs, much like many of today’s anabaptist sects. “Separation” can be a good thing, but we need to remember that true believers in Christ have also been entrusted with the privilege of reflecting Christ’s light of truth to the world.
The scribes were primarily copyists of the Law and were considered something of experts due to their intimate acquaintance with texts. They were looked upon as being teachers and often aligned with the Pharisees in their thinking. In Westernized Christianity, we have our many educated teachers as well. This isn’t always a good thing, as scribes are sometimes mentioned by Jesus along with Pharisees as being hypocrites.(Matt. 23)
Lastly, the Herodians were another primarily secularized group with strong political motivation. Their focus was on cooperation with Roman leaders. Again, Westernized Christianity offers a counterpoint as we often attempt to influence laws and leaders–sometimes to the point that these efforts take on the form of idolatry.
The Laodicean period brings Jewish history into the time of the Pax Romana, which is where my Christian Church history journey began in Ephesus. While I’m merely pointing out similarities in the chronological order, I think it might be wise for professing believers to consider what history tells us.
When Jesus came the first time, it was as a helpless baby who grew up to confront a largely apathetic society which was relatively comfortable and felt little need to accept Him as Messiah. When He returns, it will be as reigning King and, in light of the historical pattern, I do wonder if we are swiftly approaching that moment.
Don’t worry, I’m not going to play false prophetess and try to predict a day and time. I’m not even sure yet what to make of this little trail. But, considering the generalized state of the church and overall condition of the world, I cannot help but think of:
Luk 21:25-36 “And there will be signs in sun and moon and stars, and upon the earth distress of nations in perplexity at the roaring of the sea and the waves,
men fainting with fear and with foreboding of what is coming on the world; for the powers of the heavens will be shaken.
And then they will see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.
Now when these things begin to take place, look up and raise your heads, because your redemption is drawing near.”
And he told them a parable: “Look at the fig tree, and all the trees;
as soon as they come out in leaf, you see for yourselves and know that the summer is already near.
So also, when you see these things taking place, you know that the kingdom of God is near.
Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away till all has taken place.
Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.
“But take heed to yourselves lest your hearts be weighed down with dissipation and drunkenness and cares of this life, and that day come upon you suddenly like a snare;
for it will come upon all who dwell upon the face of the whole earth.
But watch at all times, praying that you may have strength to escape all these things that will take place, and to stand before the Son of man.” (MKJV)
***Some notes on Antiochus and the religious sects are paraphrases of information in the back of my NASV Ryrie study Bible.